Contribute to this Blog!

Add comments or email your proposed entry. See our Appendix site for more detailed analysis.

Why recall the Mayor of Berkeley?

Mayor Tom Bates...


  • does not listen to the constituents of Berkeley

  • suppresses the concerns of citizens to satisfy developers

  • takes federal HUD Section 8 money (that should be used to help qualified tenants with rents) and slots it for developers so they can build high-density, modern apartment buildings in the heart of downtown, that will either remain empty, or be filled with students and young professionals. ( They are primarily filled w/ individuals NOT from Berkeley-- you might also want to know how units were left unfilled once people had died and the City continued to pay the developers rent on behalf of the deceased.)

  • Uses the "Green" movement as a pretext to overdevelop town, cut down trees, and transfer city, state, and federal funds to developers.

  • voted to rid Berkeley of Iceland, a landmark skating rink.

  • Does not notify the public in advance of important meetings

  • Provides no evidence for the claims he makes

  • No accommodation of those who wish to express dissent

  • Says, "Let's focus on obtaining federal/state funds now, and we'll worry about the final plans later," whether he's talking about procuring funding for the Ashby transit village or the BRT

  • On the Warm water pool--he should be supporting adaptive reuse and sustainability--the City's own letter to the BUSD stated that the building should be saved. Bates could apply for federal and State dollars to develop a preservation program vs using City GF dollars. He looks to us to carry the entire burden vs leveraging our dollars
  • another recall site is: http://berkeleyrecall.com/

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Transit Village(s) & Ashby Bart



While in Sacremento on our dime as a legislator Bates managed to pass Transit Village legislation which he is now using to try to develop a vast housing development replacing the parking lot at Ashby Bart.

He tried to force it through with a phony "citizen's" commission representing the area, which he appointed himself. This failed. He evidently is trying something else that the home owners in the area do not want.

Read a full account of the Ashby BART controversy on our appendix page. Here is an excerpt:

Government officials who face overwhelming public opposition have roughly three options at their disposal. If they concern themselves with the democratic process, and therefore regard themselves as servants of the public, and not Lords who rule by fiat, they will of course heed to the will of the people. The second option is to make a compromise, rendering a decision that’s somewhere in the realm between overwhelming public opinion, and, in this particular case, the Mayor, a Councilmember, and handful of hungry developers.

The third option—the one chosen by Mayor Bates—is to manufacture a façade of public participation, while proceeding to do whatever he intended to do before confronting public opposition. This is where Ed Church and the
South Berkeley Neighborhood Development Corporation (SBNDC) enter into the story. Knowing full well the controversial nature of his grant proposal, Mayor Bates assigned the SBNDC with the duty of creating a task force to lead the project, to appoint ‘community members’ to its ranks to develop a “shared vision” for the Ashby project.

Other areas for unseemly development include San Pablo Ave, and the current Kragens Auto on University, which is becoming the Trader Joe's building, whose 5 story height and traffic impact will overwhelm the previous quiet residential neighborhood.

The Mayor has been quoted that the Hillside School would be a good site for a 20 story building. You will recall that this prized neighborhood school was closed by politicians intent on weakening the hills politically and blaming earthquake considerations.