Contribute to this Blog!

Add comments or email your proposed entry. See our Appendix site for more detailed analysis.

Why recall the Mayor of Berkeley?

Mayor Tom Bates...


  • does not listen to the constituents of Berkeley

  • suppresses the concerns of citizens to satisfy developers

  • takes federal HUD Section 8 money (that should be used to help qualified tenants with rents) and slots it for developers so they can build high-density, modern apartment buildings in the heart of downtown, that will either remain empty, or be filled with students and young professionals. ( They are primarily filled w/ individuals NOT from Berkeley-- you might also want to know how units were left unfilled once people had died and the City continued to pay the developers rent on behalf of the deceased.)

  • Uses the "Green" movement as a pretext to overdevelop town, cut down trees, and transfer city, state, and federal funds to developers.

  • voted to rid Berkeley of Iceland, a landmark skating rink.

  • Does not notify the public in advance of important meetings

  • Provides no evidence for the claims he makes

  • No accommodation of those who wish to express dissent

  • Says, "Let's focus on obtaining federal/state funds now, and we'll worry about the final plans later," whether he's talking about procuring funding for the Ashby transit village or the BRT

  • On the Warm water pool--he should be supporting adaptive reuse and sustainability--the City's own letter to the BUSD stated that the building should be saved. Bates could apply for federal and State dollars to develop a preservation program vs using City GF dollars. He looks to us to carry the entire burden vs leveraging our dollars
  • another recall site is: http://berkeleyrecall.com/

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

BRT Bus Rapid Transit with Dedicated Lanes


Bates is trying to hide behind the Transportation Commission whose members and staff throttle off discussion of whether the BRT comes up at planning meetings.

BRT will take two lanes out of the middle of Telegraph Ave in Oakland, eliminate much of the parking in front of all the new little businesses that have grown up from 15th St. in Oakland, and Dwight Way in Berkeley, and lay waste the economic structure of what has rather surprisingly become a beautiful tree lined Boulevard in recent years.

Huge Van Hool diesel buses lumber up and down the Ave quickly now. It is hard to see value in tearing up the streets. It is easy to see the terrible congestion and destruction of businesses that will result. San Leandro told AC Transit no. So should Berkeley. In the non peak hours a bus will come by occasionally. In the mean time all 4 lanes of the street are busy with normal traffic. In peak hours droves of buses roam the streets, but the traffic flows for all. BRT would cause extreme jams.

Just last Friday night one N bound lane of Telegraph was blocked at 51st, completely jamming traffic. We were headed to Kentucky fried chicken on Telegraph for dinner and ended up at a Thai restaurant on College Ave, trying to get out of the traffic jam.

Tom is not on the AC Board of Directors but he meets with members every week to push his agenda and is pushing with this program without much community support. Neighbors do not support this. The only supporters in meetings seem to be non Berkeley people who make their living working in traffic planning and have sort a religious belief in BRT.