Contribute to this Blog!

Add comments or email your proposed entry. See our Appendix site for more detailed analysis.

Why recall the Mayor of Berkeley?

Mayor Tom Bates...


  • does not listen to the constituents of Berkeley

  • suppresses the concerns of citizens to satisfy developers

  • takes federal HUD Section 8 money (that should be used to help qualified tenants with rents) and slots it for developers so they can build high-density, modern apartment buildings in the heart of downtown, that will either remain empty, or be filled with students and young professionals. ( They are primarily filled w/ individuals NOT from Berkeley-- you might also want to know how units were left unfilled once people had died and the City continued to pay the developers rent on behalf of the deceased.)

  • Uses the "Green" movement as a pretext to overdevelop town, cut down trees, and transfer city, state, and federal funds to developers.

  • voted to rid Berkeley of Iceland, a landmark skating rink.

  • Does not notify the public in advance of important meetings

  • Provides no evidence for the claims he makes

  • No accommodation of those who wish to express dissent

  • Says, "Let's focus on obtaining federal/state funds now, and we'll worry about the final plans later," whether he's talking about procuring funding for the Ashby transit village or the BRT

  • On the Warm water pool--he should be supporting adaptive reuse and sustainability--the City's own letter to the BUSD stated that the building should be saved. Bates could apply for federal and State dollars to develop a preservation program vs using City GF dollars. He looks to us to carry the entire burden vs leveraging our dollars
  • another recall site is: http://berkeleyrecall.com/

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

HUD Housing and Urban Deveopment Subsidised Housing


Berkeley's Housing Dept was recently cited for especially poor performance and the entire staff dismissed. The head of Berkeley's City Dept of Housing was also dismissed. It seems a HUD audit had finally pointed out that the local housing job was not being done right.

The waiting list was over 5 years old. It was a mess so that no one could tell the order of selection, and had to be discarded. It seemed that no one was ever selected from the list anyway. The funds were set aside to be allocated to new buildings as a sort of subsidy. What many people don't know is that there are cheap vacant units available that no one is taking. Legitimate candidates were ignored.
Section 8 Vouchers are meant for needy people as they come available but the head of the housing dept just held them aside and dubbed them "Project Based Section 8 Centificates.'
' (The City in general provides higher than fair market rents to the developer which in turn provides fewer vouchers for those who truly need housing. The developers are provided Market or above market rents for inclusionary units--this results in the Double dipping (developer gets higher rent for an inclusionary unit and gets to claim that he is providing affordable housing) and the City gets less affordable housing.
This guarantees rental income for the developer, even on vacant units.

The city had to board up and set aside City built subsidized housing as not affordable for the city to keep under repair. The contractor responsible for managing the units was collecting extremely high fees and doing little or no work. The City leverage funds for ten years to repair these properties and in a couple of years they were inhabitable.

The Mayor and others had been ignoring this mess for years because the HUD subsidies were being funneled to new developments that the Mayor wanted.